/Specifications
Technical Reference

Technical Specifications

Detailed algorithm parameters, performance benchmarks, and integration patterns for implementing quantum-resistant cryptography across your infrastructure.

Classical vs Hybrid Performance

Handshake LatencyCPU UtilizationMemory FootprintBandwidth Overhead0306090120
  • Classical
  • Hybrid (PQC)

Handshake Latency

112ms

+49% vs classical (75 ms)

CPU Utilization

32%

+167% vs classical (12 %)

Memory Footprint

20KB

+167% vs classical (7.5 KB)

Bandwidth Overhead

6.5KB/handshake

+117% vs classical (3 KB/handshake)

Performance Impact Analysis

Acceptable Overhead

The hybrid approach adds approximately 50% latency to TLS handshakes (75ms to 112ms), which remains well within acceptable thresholds for most applications. CPU utilization increases are manageable with modern hardware.

Optimization Strategies

Key caching, session resumption, and connection pooling can mitigate much of the overhead. Hardware acceleration via PQC-capable HSMs further reduces computational impact on high-throughput systems.